A curious experiment with Gemini has produced an unexpected result: by keeping essentially the same prompt and making small, incremental edits, AI-generated images of a deep underground excavation seemed to become progressively more realistic. There was no explicit scoring system, no long feedback loop and no attempt to make the model evaluate itself. So what actually improved—the model, the prompt, or the human directing the experiment? The answer remains surprisingly unclear.
Posts tagged as “prompt engineering”
I hit a usage wall, experimented with editing an earlier message, and unexpectedly found that I could continue the analytical thread. I don't know exactly why it worked, but for a late-night data crunch when you refuse to lose your train of thought, it's a remarkably handy behavior to keep in mind.
